T 5.03 Materials for Energy applications

Analyzing thermal hysteresis of magnetocaloric materials using TFORC: application to  (NiMnSi)0.66(Fe2Ge)0.34

Cosmin Radu 1, Brad Dodrill 1, David Daughton 1, Tetsuo Shimizu 1, Harry Reichard 1, Luis M. Moreno-Ramírez 2, Victorino Franco 2

1 Lake Shore Cryotronics, United States
2 University of Seville, Spain
Magnetocaloric effect TFORC Thermal hysteresis

Magnetocaloric materials with first order phase transition typically exhibit a larger magnetocaloric response than their second order phase transition counterparts [1,2]. However, the nature of the phase transition implies thermal hysteresis, which has to be avoided to be able to use the materials in cyclic conditions. Temperature First Order Reversal Curves (TFORC) analysis has been recently proposed to understand the hysteretic behavior of magnetocaloric materials [3]. Initially used as a fingerprinting technique, detailed models of phase transformations [4] enabled the interpretation of the different features found in the experimental results [5]. 

Despite being conceptually similar to the conventional field FORC, TFORC has some peculiarities related to the temperature dependence of the magnetization of the different phases. In addition, it used to be a very cumbersome technique due to the extensive data processing needed. In this work we show an optimization of a VSM magnetometer, with specific TFORC software and optimized thermal control, which makes TFORC experiments significantly more efficient.

The application  of TFORC to (NiMnSi)0.66(Fe2Ge)0.34 [6] is illustrated in this talk. The asymmetry of the phase transformation is identified by triangular-like peaks in the heating and cooling TFORC distributions (Figure 1). This alloy has a significant separation between the Curie temperature of the martensite and the magnetostructural transformation, which justifies the lack of negative areas above the peaks. The comparison between heating and cooling distributions also provides additional information about the asymmetry of the martensitic transition. 

[1] V. Franco, J.S. Blázquez, J.J. Ipus, J.Y. Law, L.M. Moreno-Ramírez, A. Conde, Progress in Materials Science 93 (2018) 112

[2] C. Romero-Muñiz, J.Y. Law, J. Revuelta-Losada, L.M. Moreno-Ramírez, V. Franco, The Innovation Materials 1 (2023) 100045

[3] V. Franco, T. Gottschall, K.P. Skokov, O. Gutfleisch, IEEE Magn. Lett. 7 (2016) 6602904

[4] L.M. Moreno-Ramírez, V. Franco, Metals 10 (2020) 1039

[5] A. Díaz-García, L.M. Moreno-Ramírez, J.Y. Law, F. Albertini, S. Frabbrici, V. Franco, J. Alloys Compd. 867 (2021) 159184

Figure 1: TFORCs in heating and cooling modes of (NiMnSi)0.66(Fe2Ge)0.34 and corresponding TFORC distributions
Figure 1: TFORCs in heating and cooling modes of (NiMnSi)0.66(Fe2Ge)0.34 and corresponding TFORC distributions

Sponsors

With the support of

bologna welcome convention and visitors bureau visit emilia romagna